Response to "Employers, employees should begin dialogue on jobs for older workers"
Url: http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/277181/1/.html
This article is about the government's decision to re-employ older workers due to Singapore's ageing workforce. According to Mr Lim Boon Heng, employers have not been taking the ageing workforce seriously, nor have they began tapping into this source of workers. However, an older workforce is inevitable, and this legislation is expected to kick in in another 5 years, after concerns have been voiced and addressed.
An ageing workforce is a serious issue, as it means older employees. That is not necessarily bad, however, as an older employee may be more experienced. The trade-off might be the efficiency at which a task is performed. In any case, I feel that hiring older people, or even allowing older workers to keep their jobs is generally a good thing.
Firstly, I feel that this plan is getting to grips with what appears to be a major problem for the future of Singapore. In geography class, an ageing population is described as a bad situation, when there are fewer young people to maintain the country's economy. However, our government has turned this problem around by mobilizing the older population for work.
Secondly, I believe that this plan will also provide something meaningful for the older generation to do: they can stretch their legs, and not be a burden to the family. They can enjoy their work, and even contribute to their family's monetary earnings. In a way, this is killing two birds with one stone; the older population do not laze around, but engage in activities which please and benefit everyone, especially themselves.
I feel that there are bound to be people who are concerned about legislation and how it will affect them. This group of people should be the existing employees who fall between the twenties to middle-aged. The obvious questions in their mind should be, "Will I get to keep my job after this legislation? Will there be tougher competition?" The government will not force employers to create additional jobs; it is entirely up to their discretion. Regardless, the government will ensure that those with existing positions keep them for a few years more.
With the older generation going out to work again, some people might have qualms about it. Some of us do not feel safe riding in a taxi driven by an old man; few people can imagine men or women above sixty working as accountants. However, I feel that it gives a more general view of society. We should not stereotype the older generation as white-haired people who sit in the park, playing Chinese chess all day. Regarding the taxi driver example, while it is true that older people have poorer eyesight, they are still more experienced than any middle-aged driver. A good way to solve this is to conduct regular eye screening for the older taxi drivers, to make sure that their eyesight is satisfactory.
As a minor in society, I might have the wrong intepretation of ideas, but it is obvious that legislation will benefit the country's economy.
This article is about the government's decision to re-employ older workers due to Singapore's ageing workforce. According to Mr Lim Boon Heng, employers have not been taking the ageing workforce seriously, nor have they began tapping into this source of workers. However, an older workforce is inevitable, and this legislation is expected to kick in in another 5 years, after concerns have been voiced and addressed.
An ageing workforce is a serious issue, as it means older employees. That is not necessarily bad, however, as an older employee may be more experienced. The trade-off might be the efficiency at which a task is performed. In any case, I feel that hiring older people, or even allowing older workers to keep their jobs is generally a good thing.
Firstly, I feel that this plan is getting to grips with what appears to be a major problem for the future of Singapore. In geography class, an ageing population is described as a bad situation, when there are fewer young people to maintain the country's economy. However, our government has turned this problem around by mobilizing the older population for work.
Secondly, I believe that this plan will also provide something meaningful for the older generation to do: they can stretch their legs, and not be a burden to the family. They can enjoy their work, and even contribute to their family's monetary earnings. In a way, this is killing two birds with one stone; the older population do not laze around, but engage in activities which please and benefit everyone, especially themselves.
I feel that there are bound to be people who are concerned about legislation and how it will affect them. This group of people should be the existing employees who fall between the twenties to middle-aged. The obvious questions in their mind should be, "Will I get to keep my job after this legislation? Will there be tougher competition?" The government will not force employers to create additional jobs; it is entirely up to their discretion. Regardless, the government will ensure that those with existing positions keep them for a few years more.
With the older generation going out to work again, some people might have qualms about it. Some of us do not feel safe riding in a taxi driven by an old man; few people can imagine men or women above sixty working as accountants. However, I feel that it gives a more general view of society. We should not stereotype the older generation as white-haired people who sit in the park, playing Chinese chess all day. Regarding the taxi driver example, while it is true that older people have poorer eyesight, they are still more experienced than any middle-aged driver. A good way to solve this is to conduct regular eye screening for the older taxi drivers, to make sure that their eyesight is satisfactory.
As a minor in society, I might have the wrong intepretation of ideas, but it is obvious that legislation will benefit the country's economy.
